Thursday, May 30, 2024
HomeFinanceWhy Kwasi Kwarteng could not survive the battle with the Bank of...

Why Kwasi Kwarteng could not survive the battle with the Bank of England

[ad_1]

Jeremy Hunt was appointed U.K. chancellor of the exchequer on Friday after Kwasi Kwarteng was sacked in response to the market’s rebellion over his tax-cutting budget.

Kwarteng lasted just 38 days, the second shortest tenure for the office in history. It was Prime Minister Liz Truss who wielded the knife. But, arguably, it was Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey who set up the hit.

Simply put, in the fight between monetary and fiscal policy, Threadneedle Street has taken out Downing Street. Once Bailey stood his ground, Kwarteng was toast.

To explain, a quick recap. Kwarteng’s recent budget containing £45 billion in tax cuts, mainly funded by more debt issuance, came at a time when government borrowing costs were already rising as the Bank of England raised interest rates to combat inflation at 40-year highs around 10%.

Indeed, Kwarteng’s proposals were seen juicing up spending just as the BoE was trying to damp demand in its efforts to push inflation back to the 2% target. The market recognized this dichotomy and rebelled, realizing that it faced more debt sales and even tighter monetary policy.

The resulting selling by over-leveraged pension funds caused a crash in gilt prices and surging yields to multi-decade highs, threatening to break the U.K pension system. Bailey stepped in to calm the markets by pledging a bond buying package of up to £65 billion — right around the time when he had planned to actually sell gilts as part of quantitative tightening.

It worked, mostly. But, keen to ensure the City of London would undertake the necessary deleveraging quickly, and it would not be infected with moral hazard, Bailey said the support would end on Friday October 14th.

And this week he stressed it would definitely end on Friday.

So, to the present. What Bailey’s insistence meant was that the BoE, via monetary policy, was done helping. If the bond market was still to be worried about the situation when it opened on Monday, then it would have to be the fiscal side that changed.

And for the fiscal side to shift it would mean the removal of the tax-cutting elements that so rattled investors. Some, like the axing of the top rate of personal tax, had already been reversed. But more needed to be done to try and recover a sense of fiscal prudence.

And that, inevitably, meant the removal of the author of the budget: Kwarteng.

Shortly after his departure, Truss announced that she was seeking to calm markets and had decided to cancel the corporation tax cut that had been a cornerstone of the budget. The proposal, delivered just 21 days ago, was now an ideological husk.

[ad_2]

Source link

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular

Recent Comments